Get rid of your mortgage, loans, because interest rates set to rise

Get rid of your mortgage, loans, because interest rates set to rise

Get rid of your loans, guys and gals, because we are going into a high interest rate period. Very high. It will be the equivalent of going into the double digit interest rates we had in the 80s where many people threw their house keys at the bank and we had record numbers of ba

Read More

E-cigarettes save lives, money

E-cigarettes save lives, money

"We know that cigarettes have thousands of chemicals in them and we know that they are killing us. They have been for over a hundred years. So now, the e-cig industry comes along with only one or two chemicals in their mixture and people are freaking out over these as well. Whe

Read More

US inches closer to big bank charges

US inches closer to big bank charges

Federal prosecutors are nearing criminal charges against some of the world’s biggest banks, according to lawyers briefed on the matter, a development that could produce the first guilty plea from a major bank in more than two decades. In doing so, prosecutors are confronting

Read More

Canada’s home sales top predictions; why a real estate crash is inevitable

Canada’s home sales top predictions; why a real estate crash is inevitable

“The assurance of relatively low borrowing costs has likely given home buyers confidence while rising home values have kept new listings at a healthy level. Stable employment has provided some assurance to owners and buyers alike.” Our website is back after many months of

Read More

Comparing today’s recession/depression to the 1980 recession

Comparing today's recession/depression to the 1980 recession

"Much like today, Americans were concerned not only with high unemployment but increasing budget deficits in the early 1980s. A September 1983 Gallup poll found that three-fourths of the public agreed that the federal government's budget deficit was a great threat (42%) or some

Read More

Why savers are getting screwed

Why savers are getting screwed

"Without the intervention of economic policymakers, interest rates would be naturally higher. That would increase the cost of borrowing for businesses and consumers, but there would be some offsetting economic benefits. Savers are getting screwed by the current monetary policy

Read More

Geithner admits USA bankrupt to US Senate

Geithner admits USA bankrupt to US Senate

"Never in our history has Congress failed to increase the debt limit when necessary. Failure to raise the limit would precipitate a default by the United States. Default would effectively impose a significant and long-lasting tax on all Americans and all American businesses

Read More

World economies on verge of currency revaluations to deal with debt

World economies on verge of currency revaluations to deal with debt

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." -- Henry Ford Basically what the world central banks are doing is increasing their money by devaluin

Read More

Is Obama the next Mugabe of Zimbabwe?

Is Obama the next Mugabe of Zimbabwe?

"America, Britain, Japan, Germany, France, Sweden, Holland, Norway, Canada and Australia make up the Fishmongers Group and their meeting on Tuesday will deliberate on the state of the inclusive government, debt relief, public finance administration and the controversial economi

Read More

US raiding foreign countries with dollars, not soldiers

US raiding foreign countries with dollars, not soldiers

""The United States is going to China and saying: we want you to commit economic suicide, just like Japan did. We want you to follow the same thing: we want you to revalue your currency, we want you to squeeze your companies, we want you to go bankrupt,” says Michael Hudson,

Read More

FDIC wants your retirement cash to save banks: Bloomberg

FDIC wants your retirement cash to save banks: Bloomberg

“The FDIC is constantly looking at structures where we can get the greatest opportunity to tap into capital that we have not had the success reaching through previous disposition methods,” FDIC spokeswoman Michele Heller said in an e-mailed statement. “We welcome and work

Read More

Canadian government admits recovery never happened

Canadian government admits recovery never happened

“Not only did their stimulus fail to create the jobs of tomorrow, it also failed to protect the jobs of today,” Scott Brison, the opposition Liberal Party’s spokesman for finance issues, said by telephone. "Most of us were shaking our heads in disbelief early last year w

Read More

Content By: The Coming Depression Editorial Staff (dates cited below)
Copyright: include link to this article on top of reproduction if you use it.
Bookmark and Share
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

government debt immigration
By Terence Corcoran of National Post

The Tory commitment to ‘eliminate’ Canada’s total net debt by 2021 now looks absurd

Debt is good, even for governments. But it depends on the kind of debt, what it’s used for and what the financial plan is for getting out of debt. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s latest revelations on the future of Ottawa’s annual deficits do not fill one with confidence that the federal government has a firm grip on the floodgates that control the level of debt in Canada, not all of which is going to be doing much good for the economy.

By 2015, said Mr. Flaherty in his surprise fiscal update on Thursday, Ottawa will have pretty well tamed the beast. He said the annual deficit in 2015 will be only be about $5-billion, “a very modest number to deal with.”

The trouble with very modest numbers in the $5-billion range is that they tend to pop up without notice on a regular basis in government operations and then quickly, like gurgling slimy creatures in the movies, turn into gigantic long-term problems that are not so easy to handle. The next thing you know, you’re dealing with real money.

For instance, the federal deficit for this year, originally estimated at $50-billion, is now a modest 10% higher at $55-billion. Going forward, Mr. Flaherty laid out a slightly revised series of deficits that would still, under the best of circumstances, run the national debt up by $170-billion by 2015. That would bring Ottawa’s total net debt to $628-billion, a record in nominal dollars and about $19,000 per capita — compared with $608-billion or $20,000 per capital in 1997, the peak year for federal debt in current dollars. The numbers are different in constant deflated dollars, but not that different. The 1997 figure would be equivalent to $24,000 today. For taxpayers, having to carry a debt burden of $20,000 today isn’t a whole lot better than $24,000 in 1997.

That’s not progress, especially from a government that in 2006 boldly committed to “eliminating total government net debt.”

Ottawa isn’t the only player in the all-new national debt game. The provinces and local governments are also running up sizable annual deficits. Ontario is heading for $18-billion this year, and a succession of additional deficits in years to come. British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec, New Brunswick, Newfoundland — they’re all riding deficits that total about $31-billion this year alone. Assuming they follow the same fiscal track Ottawa is on, Canada’s provinces are likely to add close to $100-billion in total new net debt over the next five years.

These are rough numbers, to be sure, in that they don’t take in other elements of net debt calculation. But the trend is unmistakable. At the end of 2008, the net debt of all the provinces stood at $274-billion. If they collectively add $100-billion over the next five years, as seems more than possible, total provincial net debt will rise to about $375-billion by the end of 2015. Add that number to the projected federal net debt of $628-billion by 2015, and Canada is suddenly looking at $1-trillion in debt, or about $30,000 per man, woman and child.

The numbers don’t look quite so bad when measured against the size of the economy. At $1-trillion in 2015, Canada’s net debt to GDP ratio would be about 57.5%. That’s a long way from the 90% levels Canada hit in the late 1990s. But as the chart above shows, Canada’s track to lower debt has been drastically reversed and is now on a new upward curve. As Canadians know from experience, turning annual government deficits into balanced budgets and surpluses is a painful process that implies big cuts in government spending and higher tax levels. Somebody has to repay the debt and cover the interest costs.

Back in 2006, Mr. Flaherty touted his government’s commitment to “eliminate” Canada’s total net government debt. The target date was 2021. To get there technically required fulfilling two different objectives. First, the combined federal-provincial debt, now heading for $1-trillion, had to be down to about $680-billion by 2021. That objective now looks absurd and is wildly beyond reach.

Full Article at National Post

Reader Comment:

Most countries in the free world have major un funded liabilities that I am sure one day soon will collapse the way democracy functions (2017). Never mind the National Debt, Canada has an excess of 2 trillion in unfunded liabilities that have to be paid for introduced mostly back in the 70′s. The governments of the 70′s used what is called deferral payout plans and allowed the people of those times to reap benefits without having to pay for them. But to be fair this has happened all over the free world around the same time. Why you ask? Well two reasons, 1) It was a tool to help fight off the spread of communism around the world. It was thought that if people seen a continuous rising standard of living that would promote freedom over the evils of communism. Sadly during the 60′s to the early 80′s the standard of living was artificially propped up by eliminating expenses the general population would normally have such as health care, education, housing and even retirement planing. By allowing people to keep most the money they worked for and use it how they seen fit to (Food, Trips, Consumer goods and savings) Thus people were able to buy multiple cars, houses trips every year and save etc..

Related posts:

  1. Canada's real debt seeps to 131 per cent per GDP“We’ll start paying it down once we’re back in surplus,” Flaherty said. There is a pool of money untapped by government: the practice of undeclared barter. When an individual says...
  2. Canadians collectively past $1 trillion in mortgage debt“Over the past 15 years, the volume of outstanding mortgages has increased by 194 per cent. “There is a sizable minority, about 350,000 out of 5.65 million, or about 6...
  3. US government budget deficit hits 60 year high of $1.4 trillionThe US budget deficit is expected to hit a record 1.4 trillion dollars in 2009, some 950 billion dollars greater than the shortfall recorded last year, the Congressional Budget Office...
  4. Fed needs $4 trillion in new debt notes printed“With just over a month since the QE2 announcement, discussion over the amount, implications and effectiveness of QE2 are almost as prevalent (and moot) as those over the imminent collapse...
  5. The coming $600 trillion debt bubble“As interest rates begin to rise worldwide, losses in derivatives may end up bankrupting a wide range of institutions, including municipalities, state governments, major insurance companies, top investment houses, commercial...
  6. Canada adds $135 million/day national debt while taxpayer flips hockey pucks“When the former Liberal government proposed professional hockey subsidies back in 2000, then President of the National Citizen’s Coalition Stephen Harper had this to say: “Canadians are being forced to...

This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 15th, 2009 at 10:22 pm and is filed under Countries. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.


Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights. "