Press "Enter" to skip to content

Italian court finds crucifix illegal; UK exposes multi-culturalism agenda

Afghan crucifix

“It is not racist to proclaim you do not want mass immigration — it is survival.”

Top Italian court rules crucifixes illegal in Italian schools.

Italy said today that it would challenge a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights in favour of an Italian woman who opposed the display of a Catholic crucifix at a state school attended by her two children.

Soile Lautsi, from Abano Terme, near Padua, had taken the issue to Strasbourg on the grounds that displaying crucifixes in classrooms contradicted the separation of Church and state in Italy. She was awarded €5,000 (£4,473) in damages. The court said that the school had violated religious and educational freedoms guaranteed under the European Rights Convention.

The ruling could encourage a review of the use of religious symbols in state schools throughout Europe. The court did not, however, order the Italian authorities to remove the crucifixes, and the Italian Government said that it would appeal to the European Court of Human Rights’ Grand Chamber. The Vatican said that it would study the ruling before making a comment.


The damage is done. There is NO return to the old days. Just like in Italy, France, hell, all of Europe and North America. US national identity has been destroyed. It is why homogenous nations like China, Japan and Korea are destined to rule the planet. Like it or not. The only model country that probably is competent with this plurality has been Brazil. But that country was founded that way. So in the end we are witness to the death of Europe and North America done in by our own self hating kind.

If any of you actually lived in places like Japan, Korea, China — Japan especially because they are having a population demographic problem where there are too many old people that will never be replaced — you would realize that many countries around the world do not subscribe to this idea of “multi-culturalism” because they realize it destroys national identities and keeps people segregated, alone, and into combating camps. It is not racist to proclaim you do not want mass immigration — it is survival. Indeed, we have been brainwashed for decades in North America and other Western nations that we must embrace mass immigration for many reasons including the most popular: population growth and population decline.

The academics talk about how “industrialized” countries are not reproducing their populations fast enough and that immigration is needed to replace those people. This is a blatant lie because an easy solution would be to provide incentives to people to reproduce — giving them money and providing support or something along these lines. Indeed, Russia has been paying their people large sums of money to reproduce because they too do not subscribe to this nation-destroying idea of mass immigration of peoples with dissimilar cultures and values. It is quite simply mass madness.

Story continued:

Mariastella Gelmini, the Minister for Education, said that the ruling was “an offence against our traditions. The presence of a crucifix in the classroom does not signify adherence to Roman Cathoilcism, it is a a traditional symbol. In our country nobody wants to impose the Catholic religion, let alone with a crucifix. But no-one can cancel out our identity.”

You can read the rest of the ruling on this case at Times Online

Similar attempts to destroy western culture are taking place world wide. The US is struggling under the weight of millions of illegal immigrants who have been flooding the country for 30 years. Australia, New Zealand and Canada are experiencing the same thing, and many European countries are also being flooded including Denmark, Holland, France, Spain, Germany.

“So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened. Was it through a fit of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all, but deliberate?” — Dailymail story at bottom

The idea that multi-culturalism was to be used to destabilize a country, combined with mass debt inductions, as well as a destabilized economy from “free trade” is nothing new and has been written for many decades, but mainly relegated as “conspiracy theory,” but for the past few years as many countries have seen, this theory is more reality than fiction.

Why is Canada and many other western countries importing to many people?

Canada’s federal government has never provided a rational answer to the question of why Canada has been bringing in so many people. At different times, it has claimed that it is bringing in large numbers of people to stimulate Canada’s economy, to stop an alleged population decline, or to prevent problems created by an aging population. the federal government’s own research has told it that if it is looking for a way to stimulate Canada’s economy, it should not expect immigration to do it.

With regard to population decline, in 1990, when Canada had a population of 26+ million, Health and Welfare Canada’s demographic research told the federal government that Canada’s population would continue growing until 2026 with half (130,000) the immigration we have today, so it was not necessary to announce in 1990 an increase immigration to 240,000 per year. The same Health and Welfare study concluded that Made-In-Canada alternatives (such as making use of 45+ year old unemployed males and encouraging more females to enter the workforce) were superior to immigration in dealing with an aging population (Immigration watch, 2009).

What are the criticisms of this policy?

Criticism of multiculturalism often debates whether the multicultural ideal of benignly co-existing cultures that interrelate and influence one another, and yet remain distinct, is sustainable, paradoxical or even desirable. Nation states that, in the case of many European nations, would previously have been synonymous with a distinctive cultural identity of their own, lose out to enforced multiculturalism and that this ultimately erodes the host nations distinct culture[1][2][3].

Other critics argue that multiculturalism leads directly to restrictions in the rights and freedoms for certain groups and that as such, it is bad for democracy, undemocratic and against universal human rights. For instance, Susan Moller Okin wrote about this question in her essay “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” (1999) (Wikipedia, 2009).

The hidden agenda is more scary than we think. They appear to be following the 1928 manifesto of The Frankfurt School. A Marxist organisation based in Germany in the 20’s and 30’s. Mass manipulation and control of the populace.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

The outrageous truth slips out: Labour cynically plotted to transform the entire make-up of Britain without telling us

Last updated at 8:15 AM on 26th October 2009

So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened. Was it through a fit of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all, but deliberate?

The latter explanation seemed just too outrageous. After all, a deliberate policy of mass immigration would have amounted to nothing less than an attempt to change the very make-up of this country without telling the electorate.

There could not have been a more grave abuse of the entire democratic process. Now, however, we learn that this is exactly what did happen. The Labour government has been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural sabotage.

This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually last weekend in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

And it was he who wrote a landmark speech in September 2000 by the then immigration minister, Barbara Roche, that called for a loosening of immigration controls. But the true scope and purpose of this new policy was actively concealed.

In its 1997 election manifesto, Labour promised ‘firm control over immigration’ and in 2005 it promised a ‘crackdown on abuse’. In 2001, its manifesto merely said that the immigration rules needed to reflect changes to the economy to meet skills shortages.

But all this concealed a monumental shift of policy. For Neather wrote that until ‘at least February last year’, when a new points-based system was introduced to limit foreign workers in response to increasing uproar, the purpose of the policy Roche ushered in was to open up the UK to mass immigration.

This has been achieved. Some 2.3million migrants have been added to the population since 2001. Since 1997, the number of work permits has quadrupled to 120,000 a year.

You can read the entire startling DailyMail article at this link.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *