Multiculturalism attempt to destroy national identity: UK speechwriter

immigration muslim demo london

immigration muslim demo london

Andrew Neather, who worked for Mr Straw when he was Home Secretary, and as a speech writer for Mr Blair, claimed a secret Government report in 2000 called for mass immigration to change Britain’s cultural make-up forever.

The damage is done. There is no return to the “old days.” Just like in Italy, France, hell, all of Europe and North America. US national identity has been destroyed. It is why homogenous nations like China, Japan and Korea are destined to rule the planet. Like it or not. The only model country that probably is competent with this plurality has been Brazil. But that country was founded that way. So in the end we are witness to the death of Europe and North America done in by our own self hating kind.

If any of you actually lived in places like Japan, Korea, China — Japan especially because they are having a population demographic problem where there are too many old people that will never be replaced — you would realize that many countries around the world do not subscribe to this idea of “multi-culturalism” because they realize it destroys national identities and keeps people segregated, alone, and into combating camps. It is not racist to proclaim you do not want mass immigration — it is survival. Indeed, we have been brainwashed for decades in North America and other Western nations that we must embrace mass immigration for many reasons including the most popular: population growth and population decline.

‘Dishonest’ Blair and Straw accused over secret plan for multicultural UK
By Simon Walters, Mail on Sunday Political Editor 25th October 2009

Jack Straw and Tony Blair ‘dishonestly’ concealed a plan to allow in more immigrants and make Britain more multi-cultural because they feared a public backlash if it was made public, it has been claimed. The allegation was made after a former Labour adviser said the Government opened up UK borders partly to humiliate Right-wing opponents of immigration.

Andrew Neather, who worked for Mr Straw when he was Home Secretary, and as a speech writer for Mr Blair, claimed a secret Government report in 2000 called for mass immigration to change Britain’s cultural make-up forever.

By your guess, how many unskilled immigrants per skilled immigrant are in your city?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The academics talk about how “industrialized” countries are not reproducing their populations fast enough and that immigration is needed to replace those people. This is a blatant lie because an easy solution would be to provide incentives to people to reproduce — giving them money and providing support or something along these lines. Indeed, Russia has been paying their people large sums of money to reproduce because they too do not subscribe to this nation-destroying idea of mass immigration of peoples with dissimilar cultures and values. It is quite simply mass madness.

Similar attempts to destroy western culture are taking place world wide. The US is struggling under the weight of millions of illegal immigrants who have been flooding the country for 30 years. Australia, New Zealand and Canada are experiencing the same thing, and many European countries are also being flooded including Denmark, Holland, France, Spain, Germany.

“So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened. Was it through a fit of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all, but deliberate?” — Dailymail story at bottom

The idea that multi-culturalism was to be used to destabilize a country, combined with mass debt inductions, as well as a destabilized economy from “free trade” is nothing new and has been written for many decades, but mainly relegated as “conspiracy theory,” but for the past few years as many countries have seen, this theory is more reality than fiction.

Why is Canada and many other western countries importing so many people?

Canada’s federal government has never provided a rational answer to the question of why Canada has been bringing in so many people. At different times, it has claimed that it is bringing in large numbers of people to stimulate Canada’s economy, to stop an alleged population decline, or to prevent problems created by an aging population. the federal government’s own research has told it that if it is looking for a way to stimulate Canada’s economy, it should not expect immigration to do it.

With regard to population decline, in 1990, when Canada had a population of 26+ million, Health and Welfare Canada’s demographic research told the federal government that Canada’s population would continue growing until 2026 with half (130,000) the immigration we have today, so it was not necessary to announce in 1990 an increase immigration to 240,000 per year. The same Health and Welfare study concluded that Made-In-Canada alternatives (such as making use of 45+ year old unemployed males and encouraging more females to enter the workforce) were superior to immigration in dealing with an aging population (Immigration watch, 2009).

What are the criticisms of this policy?

Criticism of multiculturalism often debates whether the multicultural ideal of benignly co-existing cultures that interrelate and influence one another, and yet remain distinct, is sustainable, paradoxical or even desirable. Nation states that, in the case of many European nations, would previously have been synonymous with a distinctive cultural identity of their own, lose out to enforced multiculturalism and that this ultimately erodes the host nations distinct culture[1][2][3].

Other critics argue that multiculturalism leads directly to restrictions in the rights and freedoms for certain groups and that as such, it is bad for democracy, undemocratic and against universal human rights. For instance, Susan Moller Okin wrote about this question in her essay “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” (1999) (Wikipedia, 2009).

The hidden agenda is more scary than we think. They appear to be following the 1928 manifesto of The Frankfurt School. A Marxist organisation based in Germany in the 20’s and 30’s. Mass manipulation and control of the populace.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

The outrageous truth slips out: Labour cynically plotted to transform the entire make-up of Britain without telling us

Last updated at 8:15 AM on 26th October 2009

So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened. Was it through a fit of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all, but deliberate?

The latter explanation seemed just too outrageous. After all, a deliberate policy of mass immigration would have amounted to nothing less than an attempt to change the very make-up of this country without telling the electorate.

There could not have been a more grave abuse of the entire democratic process. Now, however, we learn that this is exactly what did happen. The Labour government has been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural sabotage.

This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually last weekend in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

And it was he who wrote a landmark speech in September 2000 by the then immigration minister, Barbara Roche, that called for a loosening of immigration controls. But the true scope and purpose of this new policy was actively concealed.

In its 1997 election manifesto, Labour promised ‘firm control over immigration’ and in 2005 it promised a ‘crackdown on abuse’. In 2001, its manifesto merely said that the immigration rules needed to reflect changes to the economy to meet skills shortages.

But all this concealed a monumental shift of policy. For Neather wrote that until ‘at least February last year’, when a new points-based system was introduced to limit foreign workers in response to increasing uproar, the purpose of the policy Roche ushered in was to open up the UK to mass immigration.

This has been achieved. Some 2.3million migrants have been added to the population since 2001. Since 1997, the number of work permits has quadrupled to 120,000 a year.

You can read the entire startling DailyMail article at this link.

7 thoughts on “Multiculturalism attempt to destroy national identity: UK speechwriter”

  1. If you think countries like the US, UK, Canada, Australia have been “destroyed” by “political correctness”, you should look at today’s modern Spain(Espana).
    Everything that Franco’s Catholic regime has built up over 40 years, has been flushed down the toilet in the name of “secular humanism”, Spain has become so similar to Sweden, it’s no longer funny!
    Even Communists like Picasso, would be so ashamed of today’s Spain.
    It now has too many immigrants(like the UK) and a very high unemployment rate and encourages “alternative lifestyles”, like homosexuality.
    Most people have no problem with gays, but why should working-class people like us be asked to subsidise these lifestyles?
    If you think today’s America is immoral and too Neo-Roman, try today’s Spain, you would be in for a surprise!

  2. Brasil I should stress is multiracial but speaks ONE language and each group subscribes to shared core cultural values. This provides their cultural harmony and unlike my Australia does NOT have to play the multicultural charade and the consequential feel-good bullshit of our “Harmony Day” etc games!

  3. Canada will let anyone in, possibly, but NEVER Americans – I have looked at moving to Canada for at least ten years (I have a degree, no kids, my own money, my own everything – yet they’re allowing all these people from practically anywhere else to set up camp)…meanwhile back here in good ol’ Minnesota, we have so many immigrants from Somalia. This all began in 1995-96 thanks to Lutheran Social Services, who sponsored all these people to come here and then what – they had NO plan, and even worse, just dumped these people in Minneapolis, Duluth and Rochester. About 15% of these people have full-blown AIDS (another thing that we were not told until AFTER they arrived here). Now the nursing homes in South Minneapolis are full of Somali AIDS patients. Paid for by SSI. WHY IS THIS HAPPENING? This is infuriating to me as a taxpayer and as an American who wants to get out of here. And this is Minnesota! I can not imagine what living in New York, Florida, Arizona, California, Texas, Michigan, or other largely populated states must be like.

  4. Josie: It is pretty much the same situation in all Western countries. I have spent 1 year in South Korea and I will tell you they have no such problems there because they do not have open borders. They actually protect their own country and culture and people by not allowing useless gutter trash into their country to be more “multi-cultural.” This does not make them racist. It makes them realistic, and, survivalistic. I am considering moving to Spain, but I hear they have the same problems there.

  5. If anyone thinks Brazil is a multicultural paradise, you’re only kidding yourselves. “It was founded that way”, that’s entirely laughable. Aside from ethanol, it’s basically a typical 3rd world hellhole separated by light and dark. Massive crime and poverty are just a few of its strong points. Multiracial societies have always been failures in the past and will continue to be in the future. Brazil could go up in flames at any moment, along with Los Angeles, another 3rd world paradise.

  6. Why are they doing this?I have always known they were doing this and anyone who dare oppse them they dare call racist,fu**in racist it was my ancestors who fought the nazis to keep my island and its people free.and they dare call us racist for wanting to live in OUR own land with OUR own people.How is that racist and to be fair as long as no one kills another over race i don’t care if you are racist,what is this rubbish

    It should be first in line first served instaed i see immigrants who have driven our jobs away and made the poorer indeginous people in this country poorer,one immigrant dared to say the uk is now a ghetto yeah because him and his family came here from india,thats why

    My ancestors fought for this country and this is how they repaied them,they are scum filth who run this world with their agendas

  7. I accept break down of families, this prevents kingship (that is why US had mafia wars). But, the rest is just a bust.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *